Hello Eowyn,
I am writing to express my dissatisfaction regarding the procedures followed by the casino, particularly in regards to their insistence that it is solely my responsibility to verify all details before creating an account. This stance is problematic, especially considering their previous assertions stated on their website rollingslots that taking a break was possible simply by contacting support which i literally did numerous times between July 12th and July 14th. (P.S. to the rollingslots representative : Transparency would entail sharing chat transcripts upon request rather than repeatedly neglecting my concerns despite numerous email requests for the transcripts !! )
Now, they claim to not understand the nature of my complaint and are seemingly avoiding addressing the issue. To clarify, my complaint revolves around the casino's failure to comply with responsible gambling regulations and their creation of a situation where players are trapped in a dead-end scenario with no opportunity to withdraw their winnings. Allow me to elaborate on the situation to ensure everyone reading this complaint fully comprehends the gravity of the matter that has been repeatedly dismissed.
Imagine the following scenario: You find yourself as a player with $1 million in winnings currently in your casino account. However, you are also struggling with a gambling addiction, and you know that if you leave that money in your account for the next 24 hours, it will inevitably be lost due to the withdrawal daily limits.
In a reputable casino, there would be a solution to this dilemma: self-exclusion. By opting for self-exclusion, players can prevent themselves from further gambling activity while still having the ability to withdraw their winnings.
Unfortunately, due to rule 7.3, this option is not available. Players are left with no alternative, even after requesting a break that is denied according to the casino's reasoning, but to either continue playing and risk losing everything or forfeit their winnings.
If the self-exclusion feature in Rollingslots casino were functioning correctly, there would be no grounds for complaint, as players like myself could self-exclude and protect their funds.
However, it appears that there is a flaw in the terms themselves, particularly in the self-exclusion policy.
Now, put yourself in the shoes of a player facing this predicament in Rollingslots casino with $1 million at stake due to a gambling problem. What actions would you take to prevent the loss of all your winnings?
It seems evident that the tactic employed is to avoid paying players and force them to lose their hard-earned winnings, exacerbating their existing issues, which only serves to justify such unethical practices.
Eowyn, I believe you understand the situation now. I'd really appreciate it if you could take another look at everything. This whole ordeal has been a waste of time and has made my gambling problem worse.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter and for your understanding.
Best regards,
rexola23
Share on
Twitter
Facebook
Delicious
Reddit
Copy Page URL