Unlicensed JuiceBet Casino Tested: Did Insanely High Minimum Withdrawal Limit Result in No Withdrawal?

Once again trying luck with an unlicensed online casino, our hard-working team selected JuiceBet Casino to take a closer look and see what’s offered on this gambling platform. Our tester, who has so far inspected numerous casinos was instructed to follow the same pattern and bring us some valuable information about payments, games, the ID verification process, and so on.

Most of the test went pretty well, however, things changed during the culmination of the test- withdrawal. As hinted in the title, higher cashout limits appeared as an obstacle, resulting in a negative outcome.

Before sharing our tester’s precious insights, why don’t we catch a glimpse of the key moments of the investigation of the unlicensed JuiceBet Casino?

• Tester of the day: RedApple
• Registration date: August 29, 2024
• Deposit date: EUR 200 via Coinbase on August 29, 2024, the tester received BTC 0.00410608
• ID verification- documents submitted on August 29, 2024 (image of the passport, selfie with the ID document, utility bill, and screenshot of Bitcoin wallet)
• Withdrawal not attempted due to high minimum withdrawal limit

What exactly counts as a “high minimum withdrawal limit”? Keep reading our insightful JuiceBet Casino test report and discover!

JuiceBet Casino Overview

Supporting a variety of digital currencies, US-friendly JuiceBet Casino provides players the utmost flexibility with deposits and withdrawals, especially if they describe themselves as fans of crypto payments. Offering three channels of communication with the customer support department, the operator wants to let consumers know that their voice is heard.

Teamed up with several renowned content providers, it offers a highly diversified selection of games, including slots, table games, and live dealer games. A well-organized sportsbook is featured as well, ensuring each and every player can find something suitable to explore.

Yet, despite quote attractive portfolio and selection of banking options, players should be cautious when visiting this place as it operates without a license, as mentioned earlier. Although the Terms note the platform is licensed by Curacao, the clickable seal is nowhere to be found on the site.

That was, after all, one of the reasons our team was curious to examine it.

Registration

To get the journey started, the tester decided to create the account. Having typed in the username, e-mail, password, and confirmation, he was forwarded to the second stage to enter his name, last name, gender, and date of birth.

After filing in the country, city, address, ZIP code, currency, and phone number in the third stage, he officially joined this iGaming community.

It’s important to note that the account will be closed and winnings confiscated if a player uses a VPN/proxy or is involved in fraudulent/ criminal activity.

“When the account is closed or suspended for whatever reason, Juicebet reserves the right to close any future accounts that may be registered by the same person, device, address, or that may use the same payment wallets or credit cards, and void/cancel all bets and transactions of those accounts.”

Deposit

As soon as he joined JuiceBet Casino, the tester went on to fund the account. He opted to make a EUR 200 deposit via Bitcoin, which amounted to BTC 0.00410608.

Paying attention to the cashier, players shall notice an abundance of options such as BTC, ETH, LTC, USDC, Neosurf, cards, and so on, meaning there’s lots of flexibility with transactions. The minimum amount ranges from EUR 20- EUR 30, depending on the method selected.

When making a deposit, consumers can select from a couple of predetermined amounts (EUR 50, EUR 100, EUR 250, EUR 500, or EUR 1,000) or simply type in the desired amount to replenish, just like our tester did.

Upon registration, a player chooses an account balance currency (USD, EUR, or CAD), and it this cannot be changed later. Worth noting is that a user cannot request withdrawals in a currency other than the supported ones.

ID Verification

While waiting for the funds to hit his balance, the tester decided to upload documents for KYC. Via the dedicated section on the operator’s official website, he uploaded an image of his passport, a selfie with an ID, a utility bill, and a screenshot of his BTC wallet.

“The first three successful deposits to the account will be followed up with the ID verification procedure intended to validate the player's personal information and payment details due to security protocols.”

When it comes to data security, Terms indicate that the industry-standard 256-bit SSL encryption is implemented to keep players’ private information protected from third-party access.

Gameplay

With money on his casino balance and KYC documents uploaded, the next thing the tester wanted to do was explore the operator’s well-equipped catalog. The first adventure he selected was Lady of the Woods Cash Rush.

Following this, he checked out Pop the Bank. After launching 1,000 Winning Nights, he quickly switched to Angry Zeus Jackpot and then he launched Purrfect Payouts. The next in line was Max Catch.

Withdrawal

At some point the tester checked the minimum withdrawal amount for the method he selected, discovering that it amounted to EUR 150. Having read that, he didn’t even attempt to make a cashout request, as the available amount was notably below the permitted minimum. He continued playing until there were available funds on his balance.

To cash out, players can use Bitcoin, Tether, card, and bank wire. According to the Terms, it takes three business days for a cashout request to be processed. Also, a withdrawal is possible only when at least one deposit has been successfully made and wagered. Only one pending cashout is permitted at the time.

Conclusion

Once again extensive testing procedures confirmed that dealing with unlicensed casinos is never a good idea. They may look appealing with attractive games, bombastic bonuses, and convenient payment options, but beneath that, a bunch of issues are hidden.

Aside from the obvious red flag (the absence of a license), this operator has extremely player-unfriendly minimum cashout limits. That’s another reason why consumers should avoid this place, and seek an alternative.

Showing you how casinos shouldn’t treat their players, we hope this test has served as another valuable lesson in expanding your gaming knowledge. Gamble responsibly!